Blog PostsMedia & PsychologyCommunication TheoriesMedia Logic is Dead, Long Live the New Media Logic

Media Logic is Dead, Long Live the New Media Logic

We need a new playbook for a networked media landscape.

Media logic is dead … at least in its traditional form.

The media logic we know might be dead, but it’s quickly being replaced by new logic. We must speed up our digital transformation processes — or risk PR going out of style.

The new online media logic is potentially even more potent than the traditional mass-media logic that we’ve grown accustomed to. Everyone with internet access is several steps closer to real mass influence — all the while, special interests will be able to circumvent traditional gatekeepers and speak directly to their sometimes massive audiences.

In such a digital-first world, and we’re racing towards it, we must be proactive and always stay in front of fast-paced developments.

What is media logic?

As technology shifts to digital and news cycles become shorter, journalists might begin to favour news stories that journalists can produce faster and faster.

Contrary to popular belief, media logic is not one single theory. Instead, it’s a collection of theories around how media works aside from the perfect idea of how it should work. One way to illustrate this discrepancy is to consider three central aspects of media; production, distribution, and media use:

Media logic.
The dimensions of media logic (Esser 2013:173).

For example, a national newspaper should ideally produce news reports from all parts of the country — that’s how it should work. However, due to commercial imperatives, new distribution models, and changes in consumer behaviours, the newspaper might lean towards producing journalism closer to where the reporters work, where most paying readers live and rely more heavily on click-baiting.

Media Logic Based on Network effects

In a mass media-centric society, there are few senders and many recipients. Hence, the senders’ agenda will affect the many.

In a network-centric society, we are all senders and recipients simultaneously. Marshall McLuhan stated the idea that the media tends to amplify the human body; the telephone is an amplification of your ears and a notebook an amplification of your memory.

Networked media is displacing human-to-human relations and group dynamics across both time and distance in a way that we can’t even begin to see the full extent of.

There are various examples of why we must update the traditional thinking around media works. And even more important, is there such a thing as an “ideal” state for networked media? Services like Google and Facebook are designed to amplify word-of-mouth mechanics, but can virality (effect) ever replace newsworthiness (idea) without something essential getting lost along the way?

The media landscape has shifted from being engineered and automated to becoming more of a mindless organism that, somewhat paradoxically, is becoming indistinguishable from the typical irrationalities of human group behaviour.

With all of this in mind, we might just be doomed to a variation of a Postman-Esque dystopia (see also How social media divides us) where we slowly stimulate ourselves to death.

I don’t think so. We have encountered significant media shifts before, and even though these shifts fundamentally changed how our society works, we survived and adapted.

The Future of PR: Online Influence and Persuasion

We need to claim the death of media logic – at least as we know it. We must harness the differences between traditional media logic and network media logic.

There should be room for future PR professionals in this brave new world, too. When Brian Solis published Putting the public back into public relations in 2009, it encapsulated the PR zeitgeist that big data and communicative behaviours would increase the relevance and importance of our profession.

And the media landscape of today sure has room for talented communication professionals. Journalists and politicians alike are desperately blaming technology. Governments are pushing tech giants to censor speech. Silent miners and mass media tycoons have found ways to confuse the selfie generation. And a lot of people are having difficulties coping with social media angst.

But to make ourselves useful, we must educate ourselves, both as professionals and as media consumers and producers. Since traditional media logic is mass media-centric, its principles have been rendered useless for those of us looking to harness the power of the social web.

Photo by Tracy Thomas on Unsplash.


Avatar of Jerry Silfwer
Jerry Silfwer
Jerry Silfwer, aka Doctor Spin, is an awarded senior adviser specialising in public relations and digital strategy. Currently CEO at KIX Communication Index and Spin Factory. Before that, he worked at Kaufmann, Whispr Group, Springtime PR, and Spotlight PR. Based in Stockholm, Sweden.

Grab a free subscription before you go.

Get notified of new blog posts & new PR courses

🔒 Please read my integrity- and cookie policy.

Social objects matter in PR — getting people to talk with each other about strategically chosen topics is a cornerstone in modern PR.
Most popular